Recent News | Last reviewed August 2026

What TOMS is

The Tour Operators Margin Scheme (TOMS) is a special VAT scheme for travel agents and tour operators established in the EU or the UK. Under TOMS, VAT is applied to the operator’s profit margin rather than the full selling price of the travel package.

The margin is calculated as the difference between what the customer pays and the VAT-inclusive cost of the services bought in from suppliers.

The scheme was introduced to simplify VAT compliance for travel businesses operating across multiple countries. It helps prevent double taxation and supports a fair allocation of VAT revenue between the operator’s country and the destination where the travel services are consumed.

TOMS Reform

Although TOMS was introduced to simplify VAT compliance for agents and tour operators, how leisure and MICE tourism is distributed has changed since the current framework was introduced. The European Commission is concerned that regulation is inconsistently applied, contains ambiguity, and can cause unfairness, undermining the competitiveness of EU businesses. A consultation was completed in 2025. Since then, options for reform have been discussed in various forums, involving participation from ETOA. A legislative proposal accompanied by an economic impact assessment is expected 2026Q4.

Current options include the potential taxation of non-EU agents and operators on their gross margins. This would significantly increase retail price to non-EU consumers, putting EU destinations at a competitive disadvantage. An easy way to address that disadvantage would be for the traveller’s home location to be the determining factor in the applicability of VAT on the margin. As we believe there is very little EU to non-EU B2C sales volume, this may represent an opportunity.

A worse option, which we understand has not yet been dismissed, would be what Germany unilaterally asserted as the correct legal interpretation of the law in 2021, but repeatedly chose not to enforce in the face of widespread concerns. If applied throughout the EU it would require non-EU operators to register in all destinations their clients visit, and pay sales tax on the retail price. This would drive retail price up even further and increase administrative burden for non-EU businesses and EU revenue authorities.

ETOA’s June 2026 memorandum on competitive risk provides a political context for reform and highlights risk to EU export revenue and soft power, and summarises what we understood to be the main regulatory options under review. We will continue to recommend reform that works for non-EU agents and operators selling EU destinations to non-EU clients, and the value-adding ecosystem of the European inbound industry.

As views vary among Member States on the merits of various proposals, and unanimity among EU27 is required, progress will be challenging. Nevertheless, the impact of imposing VAT on non-EU sales would, in ETOA’s view, be damaging to EU export revenue and its soft power: it would be seen as a ‘tariff’ on those choosing to visit. It would be a tax on the distinct service of packaging that takes place outside the EU. It would also be very hard for the European Commission to enforce.

In September 2026, ETOA will survey the market to assess potential impact of the various options under review in advance of the publication of the expected regulatory proposal.

  • For ETOA’s latest webinar on topic, click here.

 

What you need to know

  • The EU is reviewing how VAT should apply to travel and tourism: a new proposal on TOMS is expected Q4 2026.
  • The main issue is the ‘place of margin taxation’, with a realistic risk that the EU proposes to tax the margin of non-EU sales, adding cost and administrative burden to non-EU operators.
  • There is an urgent need to illustrate the impact of options on business, EU and non-EU
  • Understanding of how the travel trade works is often insufficient among policy makers.
  • Publicly-funded tourism bodies cannot easily object to government policy, so sectoral associations need to take the lead.

 

On 19 March 2026 ETOA participated in Fiscalis Workshop to review regulatory options. For ETOA’s latest webinar on topic, click here.

For note on UK application of TOMS from 2021, see Elman Wall newsletter.

For more detail, see common industry position, 2023.

In late 2024, Switzerland announced its intention to impose VAT on all consumer sales of Swiss hotel products that take place outside a “bundled” itinerary. Official guidance, considered ambiguous by many, was provided here: DE  FR.

It appeared that any business whose B2C turnover was more than 50% FIT may be within scope of this new proposal.

In March 2025, a clarification was issuedreferences to 50% have been removed, and car rental was confirmed to fall within TOMS if provided as part of a bundle. The full text (which is only available in German) is as followsSwiss TOMS circular 2025   Swiss entry into force circular 2025

ETOA on TOMS

  • Exports of tourism products and services should not be taxed in destination
  • Value-adding should be encouraged, among businesses of all sizes
  • Ease of compliance, with better consultation and notice of change

  • Lobbying and participation in expert group on legislative review
  • Expert advice through seminars, online briefings and helpline
  • Research and reports

How tourism is taxed is one of the most important factors affecting business viability. However, the added value of intermediaries in the travel sector is often poorly understood.

In terms of VAT, the EU faces three key disadvantages:

  • It taxes tourism exports
  • Holidays to non-EU destinations are VAT-free
  • Multiple VAT rates create additional complexity (despite evidence that reduced VAT supports job-generation)

VAT reporting and collection are particularly complex in tourism. Businesses operate across multiple countries, deal with different types of services, and serve customers both within and outside the EU.

The Tour Operators Margin Scheme (TOMS) remains a useful simplification. It:

  • Shares tax revenue between the destination and EU operator’s country of establishment
  • Reduces the need for multiple VAT registrations
  • Is relatively easy to administer

However, TOMS still taxes exports to non-EU clients and does not apply to non-EU businesses selling EU travel products (although this market remains small). In addition, relocating for tax efficiency is often not a viable option for smaller businesses. There is also a persistent misunderstanding that the value of packaging services is linked to where the product is delivered, rather than where the client is located.

Tax reform in this area is inherently complex. At EU level, any significant regulatory change requires unanimous agreement from all Member States.

Taxation can support tourism if it contributes to better infrastructure and services. Maintaining and improving access to Europe’s cultural and natural heritage requires investment. However, taxation that does not deliver clear benefits may provide short-term budget relief, but risks damaging long-term competitiveness.